Gold-SIlver Noise Comparison 10 Mar 26

Understanding what percentage of the current price action is noise-driven and what percentage is fundamentals-driven helps prevent emotional/panic response to volatile market swings. The metric used is a Haar Wavelet* that is efficient at separating noise from true signal without being whipsawed.  
The fundamentals underpinning gold are: safe-haven asset, hedge against inflation, a component of country foreign reserves, monetary metal, increase in demand from China and India
The fundamentals underpinning silver are: industrial demand (Solar panels, EV batteries, semi-conductors, defence [missiles, communications, drones] medical devices); increasingly becoming a monetary metal like gold, severe production deficit for continuous 6 years ; 70% of silver is a by-product of Zinc, Copper, Lead. Increase in demand from China and India.
 
Key Takeaways

-Silver noise is 3.2x higher than Gold (12.8% vs 3.9% of price)

-Both metals are undervalued vs their fundamentals — Silver by $4.23, Gold by $61.00

-Silver momentum is negative (-$1.10 over 10 days, -$0.08/day trend) — short-term weakness

-Gold momentum is positive (+$1.84 over 10 days, +$0.95/day trend) — mild uptrend

*Wavelets are a relatively new revolutionary digital signaling processing (DSP) technology that outperforms conventional DSP like Fourier Transform, Kalman Filter, Discrete Cosine Transform. and Hilbert Transform

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

USD and Gold provide a more accurate insight into the true state of the US economy than the SP500

Spot Silver Forecast for 27 Oct to 21 Nov 2025

Markov Regime Switching Model for Risk‑On/Risk‑Off Dashboards of Stock Indices