Weekly Gold and Silver Update 18 July 2026
As of 18 July 2025, the three quantitative models present a nuanced picture: a near-term constructive signal from the GBDT forecaster is offset by persistent macro headwinds flagged by both the DXY-Metals Nexus Monitor and the Real Yields Monitor.
The GBDT
model assigns a greater-than-60% probability of price gains for gold over the
next 20 and 60 days, and above-50% probability for silver across both horizons.
Median forecasts for both metals sit above current market prices. Three of four
forecast horizons carry a positive skew — meaning the model sees more room to
the upside than to the downside. A particularly notable observation this week
is that the 20-day Q90 pinball loss scores are lower than both Q50 and Q75 for
both gold and silver. As explained in the GBDT section below, this is a bullish
leading indicator: it signals that actual prices have been consistently landing
closer to the upper end of the model's predicted range, pointing to embedded
upward momentum.
However,
the macro backdrop remains challenging. The DXY-Metals Nexus Monitor composite
signals for both gold and silver are firmly in the Strong Headwind zone, driven
by a wide US-global rate differential, sustained dollar momentum, and the
weight of oil-inflation-real yield dynamics. The Real Yields Monitor reinforces
this — 10-year and 5-year TIPS real yields remain at elevated levels, raising
the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding metals and suppressing the bullish
case from the GBDT model.
|
Horizon |
Q10 |
Q25 |
Q50 (Median) |
Q75 |
Q90 |
Q95 |
Prob Up (%) |
|
Gold 20-Day |
$3,857 |
$3,932 |
$4,041 |
$4,108 |
$4,215 |
$4,504 |
63.7% |
|
Gold 60-Day |
$3,714 |
$3,899 |
$4,054 |
$4,194 |
$4,460 |
$4,864 |
63.7% |
|
Silver 20-Day |
$52.55 |
$54.58 |
$56.93 |
$61.52 |
$63.97 |
$70.27 |
58.1% |
|
Silver 60-Day |
$49.64 |
$52.54 |
$57.87 |
$63.69 |
$69.03 |
$81.55 |
60.2% |
Skew
Score Analysis
What is the Skew Score?
The Skew
Score measures whether the model's forecast is tilted more toward the upside or
the downside. It compares the gap between the optimistic forecast (Q90) and the
median (Q50) against the gap between the median and the pessimistic forecast
(Q10). A positive Skew Score means the upside potential is larger than the
downside risk — a bullish lean. A negative score means there is more room to
fall than to rise — a bearish lean. A score near zero indicates a broadly
balanced outlook. The score is calculated as:
Skew Score = (Q90
– Q50) −
(Q50 – Q10) ÷ (Q90 – Q10)
|
Horizon |
Skew Score |
Q90 – Q50 (Upside) |
Q50 – Q10 (Downside) |
Signal |
|
Gold 20-Day |
−0.0300 |
$173.23 |
$183.96 |
Neutral |
|
Gold 60-Day |
+0.0890 |
$406.50 |
$340.09 |
Bullish lean |
|
Silver 20-Day |
+0.2329 |
$7.04 |
$4.38 |
Bullish lean |
|
Silver 60-Day |
+0.1511 |
$11.16 |
$8.23 |
Bullish lean |
What is Pinball Loss?
Pinball
loss is a statistical report card for each individual quantile forecast. It
measures how accurately each quantile — Q10, Q25, Q50, Q75, Q90 — has been
tracking actual market prices over time. A lower pinball loss score for a given
quantile means that quantile has been more accurately predicting where prices
end up. Crucially, pinball loss does not tell you which direction prices are
heading — it is purely a calibration measure, telling you which part of the
model's forecast range is the best-calibrated against realised prices.
The scoring
works asymmetrically by design. For a given quantile q, the model is penalised
less when actual prices overshoot (come in above the forecast) and more when
actual prices undershoot (come in below). This means that for Q90 to record a
low pinball loss, actual prices must have been consistently landing near or
above the Q90 line — in other words, the optimistic scenario has been the
accurate one.
📈 Bullish
Signal — Low Q90 Pinball Loss: For both
Gold and Silver at the 20-day horizon, the Q90 pinball loss is lower than both
Q50 and Q75. This is a bullish leading indicator. When the high-end, optimistic
quantile scores better than the middle quantiles, it means actual prices have
been consistently landing closer to the upper end of the model's predicted
range than to the middle. In plain terms: the model's most optimistic near-term
call has been the most accurate one — a pattern historically associated with
upward price momentum. Both metals exhibit this simultaneously, adding a
notable bullish tilt to the near-term outlook.
This week's
composite signals for both Gold and Silver are in the Strong Headwind zone.
Several drivers are contributing to this reading:
The
US-global rate differential remains wide in the dollar's favour. US 10-year
yields continue to offer a premium relative to European and Japanese
equivalents, supporting dollar demand and keeping capital flows tilted away
from non-yielding metals. The DXY momentum panels confirm that the dollar has
been trading above its medium-term moving averages, maintaining a structurally
strong trend. The rolling correlation between the dollar and metals remains
intact — there is currently no meaningful divergence signal that would suggest
gold or silver are about to break free from dollar influence and rally on their
own structural thesis. The oil-inflation-real yield interaction also leans
unfavourable: energy prices and inflation expectations are not generating the
kind of real yield compression that typically provides a tailwind for precious
metals.
The Real
Yields Monitor shows both 10-year and 5-year TIPS real yields at elevated
levels this week. The 8-week rate-of-change panels — the key diagnostic layer
in this model — remain in headwind territory, indicating that yields have not
fallen far or fast enough in recent weeks to mark a genuine inflection. There
is no signal of a sustained downward move in either maturity that would point
to the early stages of a Fed pivot or an inflation re-acceleration.
The 5-year
TIPS yield in particular is the one to watch. As the more forward-looking
maturity, it is expected to lead any meaningful turn lower ahead of the
10-year. In other words, watch the 8-week delta to go below zero and form a green area. At present, it has not provided that lead signal. Until DFII5 turns
convincingly lower — ideally confirmed by the 10-year following — the
fundamental case for pausing metal sales on the basis of real yield dynamics is
not yet in place.


Comments
Post a Comment